Showing posts with label badass. Show all posts
Showing posts with label badass. Show all posts

Monday, 27 February 2017

Movie Marathon Monday: X-Men

With the impending release of Logan, it was only right that February's Movie Marathon Monday consisted of rewatching the X-Men series. Now almost two decades strong, the franchise seems to have gone from strength to strength - a fun movie day to be had.


The X-Men Series
X-Men (2000)
X2 (2003)
X-Men: The Last Stand (2006)
X-Men: First Class (2011)
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)
X-Men: Apocalypse (2016)
Runtime: 12hr 30min


Plot
Established in the Marvel universe, the superhero super-team known as the X-Men sees conflicts between various mutant groups in an ordinary world, with powers ranging from shapeshifting to weather-control. Attempting to gain the trust of the non-superhuman to further their fight, alongside highly complicated interpersonal relationships, add to an action-packed thrill-ride.

Why watch it?
A Marvel-must, greatest in its' pre-Avengers days, this fast-paced entertainment machine will keep you entertained (most of) the way through. Some brilliant characters, some impeccable battles and some laugh-out-loud comedy moments. Back-to-back opportunities to compare changes and nit-pick inconsistencies from start to finish. Truly something for everyone can be found here.

High Points
Hugh Jackman being badass; the national treasures that are Patrick Stuart and Ian McKellen; some epic fight scenes; pretty decent CGI in the later pictures; an overall interesting premise/universe.

Low Points
The Last Stand (eek!); gouge-your-eyes-out inconsistencies; some terrible recasting; some real brats; Gambit (seriously, what is he even there for?!).

Fun Fact
Russell Crowe was originally set to play the part of Wolverine, but instead turned it down and recommended his fellow-Australasian friend Hugh Jackman for the role.

Friday, 10 February 2017

Review: Live by Night

Runtime: 2hr 9min
Director: Ben Affleck
Release Date: 13th January 2017
Rating: 15 (UK), R (USA)

Written, directed and produced by the lead himself, a run-of-the-mill, roaring '20's gangster flick lacking in imagination; a quickly-forgotten, unremarkable tale.



Our story begins in a glamourised 1920's Boston; Joe Coughlin (Affleck) is a WWI-veteran and small-time hoodlum with a nepotistic bail-out and a forbidden love-affair. After being recruited by Mafia boss Maso Pescatore, Joe heads down a road of money and privilege from his new-found criminal activities in Tampa. The film leads on to the atypical gangster gun fights, dodgy deals and 'business meetings' fuelled by whisky and cigars. Amidst this, somehow (and unsubtly) thrown in are storylines of Klansmen, heroin addiction and Christianity.

In all honesty, I don't really know what this film was attempting to achieve - a little bit of everything and a whole lot of nothing encased the 130 minute viewing, leaving me unsure to an extent what even happened. The (overly-) quick pacing in certain parts were unbalanced alongside the dull, awkward rest of the movie. I found myself almost wanting to take a well-deserved nap during the screening, for I felt that I wouldn't miss much and if I had would have woken up more than capable of still keeping up with the films' 'plot'.

Ben Affleck seemed a weak link in an already weak chain - his dry performance only made worse by his failure to direct the rest of the notably irritating cast (namely, Elle Fanning and Sienna Miller, although Zoe Saldana was disappointingly bland). Robert Glenister and Chris Cooper the only saviours among the acting standards here.

The costume was superbly cliche 1920's get-up, which whilst suited the tone of the film, made Affleck appear to be wearing his dads' suit and every female seemingly permanently overdressed for the occasion. The cinematography was not diabolical, however action shots alone allowed it to shine through. Notably, the action (when it happened) was pulled off fairly well, but for a gangster movie you would think there would be a lot more - particularly boring for a 'fast-paced action flick'.


I wasn't expecting a cinematic masterpiece from Live by Night, but I did expect a hell of a lot more from a man who has over two decades of industry experience. My advice to anyone looking for an action-packed badass gangster film is to check out The Godfather or Pulp Fiction and leave this be. A shoddy performance all-round.

3/10


Saturday, 14 January 2017

Review: Assassin's Creed

Runtime: 1hr 55min
Director: Justin Kurzel
Release Date: 1st January 2017
Rating: 12A (UK), PG-13 (US)

The video game franchises' movie adaptation manages to convey a less interesting plot than the games themselves; Fassbender was very much an overqualified actor for this role.



The Assassin's Creed franchise has always been plot driven - alluding to apocalyptic storytelling about Mayan influence, templar rule and long-line ancestry of assassins. When converted into a movie, one would expect this to enhance the detail as much as the story can muster - sadly this couldn't be further from the truth.

If there is one thing I could compliment about Assassin's Creed, it's that it put in a great deal of effort in remaining true to the franchise. Anyone who has seen or played the video games will see that Michael Fassbender does look exactly like one of the assassins, there is mention of many important plot details from the games such as the Apple of Eden and the Templars, and many of the camera shots are designed to look like the games did. Too often has a video game to film adaptation completely lost all relevance of its original plot: Doom, Resident Evil and Street Fighter to name but a few, yet Assassin's Creed has managed to remain true to its brand. This, however, comes at a great cost - which is completely detrimental to the overall film quality. The camera shots during action scenes are genuinely awkward and jarring, making it difficult to actually focus on what is happening in front of your eyes, and the mention of important items in the games felt more like a checklist of things the director was required to mention rather than adding relevance to the plot: the assassins did cite the Assassin's Creed for example, but there was no given reason as to how the vow "nothing is true; everything is permitted" relates to the assassins in the plot. 

The plot follows main character Cal Lynch (Fassbender) and his spanish ancestor Aguilar, who Lynch can access the memories of through the use of a device known as the Animus - another callback to the video game series - where Lynch will re-animate moments from his ancestor's informative past. Lynch gains access to the animus through an organisation known as Abstergo, who save Lynch from being sentenced to death and contain him in a facility to extract information from Aguilar's life using the animus. Of course, Abstergo are gaining this information to use maliciously, and to ultimately control the will of humanity by finding the Apple of Eden within Aguilar's memories, which has the ability to control human nature. 

Now, a similar story does take place during the games, but it takes up until at least Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood (the third game in the series) to fully explain all of this - the Apple of Eden is only revealed in the last act of the first game - whereas the film attempts to cram as much of this information in at one time, so it is likely anyone watching who has never played the games  can't keep up or feel that the story is rushed: which is exactly the case.

Dramatic moments during the film do not feel as substantial as they are intended because every part of the film tries to add a new twist constantly: particularly the ending, which is supposed to be a surprising cliffhanger, yet I found myself not caring about any of the characters or their motives at all by the bitter end; if every moment is meant to be dramatic in the movie, then nothing stands out as intended. 

The acting quality is also not great - Sofia (Marion Cotillard) is the leading scientist on the Animus project, and Cotillard clearly tried her best to work with the material she was given, however her characters' permanent expression was always worried, making Cotillard incredibly underused. Essentially any actor could have played Fassbender's role(s); Lynch was incredibly bland, and Aguilar had barely any dialogue (and since he was also played by Fassbender, he didn't look like a spaniard as he was meant to) - unlike in the games where main character Desmond's ancestors were completely different people and did not look exactly like him. 

Overall, Assassin's Creed would definitely not be on my watchlist, and it is riddled with faults. The plot does clearly open up for a sequel, which will need to step up its quality in order to make me even vaguely interested.


2/10

Friday, 13 January 2017

Top 10: Badass Gangster Movies

Due to the UK re-release of Goodfellas on the 20th January, I thought it called for my list of top 10 badass gangster movies...



10. American History X (1998)


9. Scarface (1983)


8. Snatch (2000)

7. The Untouchables (1987)

6. Reservoir Dogs (1992)

5. The Godfather Part II (1974)

4. The Usual Suspects (1995)

3. Goodfellas (1990)

2. The Godfather (1972)

1. Pulp Fiction (1994)