Thursday, 4 May 2017

Throwback Thursday: Ghost in the Shell (1995)

Runtime: 1hr 23min
Director: Mamoru Oshii
Release Date: 8th December 1995
Rating: 15 (UK), R (US)

After the release of the new Ghost in the Shell, today's Throwback Thursday takes on the original movie, and what my thoughts are on how it may have aged over time.


Image Source
Having never watched Ghost in the Shell (1995) before, I luckily managed to go into the movie with a completely clear opinion, untainted by any other judgement than the "8/10" that imdb users have deemed the film as deserving. What I found was a slightly over-hyped yet interesting film which was completely unique to anything I had seen before.

The movie's plot follows Motoko Kusanagi, a heavily augmented "section 9" officer who in the year of 2029 must attempt to stop "The Puppetmaster", a hacker capable of hacking into the minds of the augmented and turning them into political assassins. 

Not many films require much of a learning curve to get the gist of the plot like Ghost in the Shell (1995), which, while different to over-explained and obvious western films of today, is also a disadvantage since viewers may be unable to determine what is happening as they watch. 

The animation does seem a little dated, but the style gives the movie a coat of authenticity (remastered animated movies can look unnatural), and the voice cast had tendencies to turn monotone at times (yes, I watched/listened to the English dub), but the film did make up for this with its' interesting story.

The film doesn't spend a large amount of time to ensure the viewer is maintaining an understanding of the plot, and with the dialogue not serving much more purpose than to build character for the main two roles, the only real explanation given is the environment these characters are surrounded by - the presence of cyborgs with cybernetic advancements is never explained as such, but is simply a norm in the world; the trade-off for a lack of explanation is an immersion environment and this was arguably the right choice. 

As the film comes to a close, the climax is long awaited yet the ending is open-ended and offers little closure to the whole point of the movie. Ghost in the Shell (1995) does strive to be different sometimes even to the detriment of its' own storyline. 

6.5/10

Sunday, 26 March 2017

Monthly Movie Merch

Here is my round-up of this months best movie merchandise..



..every boys' childhood dream of being a Power Ranger can now be realised with this epic Dragon Dagger Mini Kit from none other than Forbidden Planet! Just £7.99, it also comes with a quote book and some Power Rangers artwork - not a product to be missed. It's Morphin time!

..keeping up with the Disney hype, this cute Beauty & the Beast boxed vintage mug (£9.99) from Truffle Shuffle is great to add to the collection!

..Easter is but weeks away, so of course I had to include this fun Marvel Comics Milk Chocolate Easter Egg set (£13.99). Comes with some pretty cool Marvel character ear phones - a great Easter gift box for a superhero-lover.

..no Monthly Movie Merch would be complete without the inclusion of a Funko Pop; this months' choice is this kinda crazy-looking Kong: Skull Island King Kong figure - an interesting addition to this much-anticipated flick (£14.99).

..Red Bubble always have some great movie t-shirts for sale - this Ghost in the Shell tee is no exception! Just £17.40, it comes in various colours and sizes to suit all, and its' simplistic design doesn't make it merely look like tacky merch.

..why not prepare for Fast & Furious 8 with an incredibly long movie-night?! Get the full action-packed collection (movies 1 to 7) in this cool boxset for just £14.99.

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

He Said, She Said: Beauty & the Beast Review

Runtime: 2hr 9min
Director: Bill Condon
Release Date: 17th March 2017
Rating: PG (UK), PG (US)

Guest writer Natasha and I share our thoughts on this Disney classic turned live-action fairytale, starring Emma Watson and Dan Stevens.


Plot Summary
We all know the story - a shallow Prince is cursed by an enchantress, leading to him taking captor beautiful book-worm Belle many years later. Add in an ensemble of talking furniture, a handsome 'hero' to come to Belle's rescue, and a village of idiots, and you have yourself a movie that implies it teaches you that beauty is more than just skin-deep, it is about what lies within. Taken from the original animated classic (which itself came from an 18th century fairy-tale), Beauty & the Beast is the latest live-action remake of old fairy stories.

He Said...
I was so very ready to tear this film apart! A reboot of a classic - a common Hollywood cash-grab tactic - and it's starring the rather mediocre Emma Watson. I honestly believed this was going to be literally terrible, but I was pleasantly surprised by the talents of the supporting cast and the cinematography especially, with great music performance and wonderful direction, I clearly underestimated this flick. There was a specific scene where Belle walks and sings upon a hill in a blue dress; looking exactly like a Sound of Music rip-off, and plenty of the film was essentially a copy of the original - but this was a far better decision than going in a completely different direction. The film acts more as a homage to the original than a brand new take on the story, so the movie is simply a spectacle-added version of the beloved original Disney cartoon. The drawback to this is that a lack of originality can always be criticised, yet I can't see any other direction they could have taken the film - meaning it was doomed to be either slightly good or terrible from the start, it's just a relief this movie was in the slightly good category - the music had me humming as I left the cinema and the acting (even that of Emma Watson) wasn't half bad either! Overall, I can say I enjoyed the film, and that's the main thing that matters over originality, and I never thought I'd find myself saying that when my expectations were so low.

6.5/10

She Said..
Admittedly, I was prepared for my childhood Disney favourite to disappoint - despite an all-star cast and a tale as old as time, the live-action picture had me eye-rolling from trailer-day. Credit where credit is due, Beauty & the Beast was largely better than I had initially anticipated; magical atmospherics, reminiscent music and (at times) some brilliant acting (with particular nod to the supporting cast). However, I can't help but feel its' try-hard attempt at cinematic masterpiece fell short in spite of itself. The direction and choreography, while would have been seriously fantastic for a West End theatre production, did not translate nearly as well onto big screen. And while I'm all for writers prerogative, the certain elements of the story that were so unnecessarily changed made me kind of mad. Adding to my picture peeves, the 'real-life' furniture was aesthetically odd, Dan Stevens was almost forgotten about despite having the title-role, and Emma Thompson (who can all-too-often do no wrong in my eyes) really over-did it with her whole 'Eliza Doolittle' cockney accent. On the flip side, Emma Watson (who I find a bit hit or miss) shattered my misconceptions to deliver a rather wonderful depiction. Overall fairly good throughout - if slightly unremarkable. Fancy a watch anyway? Be my guest.

6.5/10

Monday, 20 March 2017

Review: Viceroy's House

Runtime: 1hr 46min
Director: Gurinda Chadha
Release Date: 3rd March 2017
Rating: 12A (UK) TBC (US)

It is a rare thing to be able to compliment a British historical drama on not showing a rose-tinted version of events - Viceroy's House deploys experienced acting and environmental charm to paint a harsh and realistic picture of events.

Image Source
From the trailer, Viceroy's House really did look like a comedy, rather than the drama it is supposed to be. It is lucky that the film did not go down this route; the partition of India caused displacement of millions, and hundreds of thousands of deaths, thus making a mockery out of this would not be the best move. 

There are some humourous moments attempted, some of which are successful, but these do not flow well into the rest of the film as well as one might think when taking the trailer into consideration. There are many inconsistent jumps between humourous and tragic moments throughout, with Lord Mountbatten (Hugh Bonneville) making wise cracks about the country he's supposed to be ruling, jumping to the news of a religious-incited riot in Calcutta, for example

Bonneville's role is perfect for his typecast, which isn't exactly a compliment since he essentially put no effort into the character; Gillian Anderson's accent as Lady Mountbatten was rather forced, and the inclusion of Jeet (Manish Dayal) and Aalia (Huma Qureshi) felt shoehorned in, and was missing key potential scenes to give their story depth. The acting overall was mediocre at best, and I did not find myself rooting for the love-story protagonists.

The movie's setting and environment was fantastic, costume design and atmosphere was near perfect as a whole, which is the greatest compliment I can give to this film; where the story and acting quality fall short of good or great, the ambiance was wonderful, and when the movie turns towards its' harsher side, the environment does still match the tone, with a crowded and dangerous atmosphere to counter-act the beautiful and picturesque scenes earlier in the film.

Image Source
The movie did seem to keep true to actual events, it is not like a British historical drama to manage to not paint Winston Churchill as a God among men. It is a shame there wasn't enough focus on the actual historical events, and concentrated on a half-finished love story during the progression of the movie.

There are some moments in the film where the characters are imposed into real footage and it looks terrible, but the cinematography is mostly acceptable - and that's what I can only describe the film as overall, simply acceptable; not terrible, but not great either.

5.5/10

Tuesday, 14 March 2017

Review: Toni Erdmann

Runtime: 2hr 42min
Director: Maren Ade
Release Date: 3rd February 2017
Rating: 15 (UK), R (US)

This Oscar-nominated German comedy may have gained favour amongst others, but failed to leave me captivated through its' depiction of politics, pranks and dysfunctional families.


The film views a snapshot of the life of Winfried Conradi - a music teacher and life-long prankster who, upon the death of his beloved canine companion, decides to visit his estranged daughter (Ines Conradi, played by Sandra Hüller) in Bucharest for her birthday.. leading to her horror as an alter-ego - 'Toni Erdmann' - begins causing a nuisance at various events as he follows her around (in an attempt to both embarrass and connect with her).

The premise of the film - though not riveting - sounds decent enough; a moving father/daughter tale with some jokes lodged in there. The screenplay, though well-written and humorous at times, came across (perhaps purposefully-) awkward and dull - somewhat lacking in that natural fluidity that many alternative comedies manage to achieve. This could be, in part, due to its' long-winded (almost 3 hour) screen-time (not many pictures can pull that off!).

Sandra Hüller was actually rather good in her role - though I struggled to want to reach her entry to the film as it started so slowly I could happily have nodded off. Once in full swing, Toni Erdmann was actually quite nicely paced, showing well how irritating, over-bearing and infuriating Winfried makes his daughter (bad-dad dancing doesn't cut it!) who, though softens to him toward the closing credits, really doesn't want her father to be a part of her world.

My main compliment here is that it is unashamedly silly whilst contributing some underlining moving, melancholic elements - something popular this season at cinemas (think Manchester by the Sea). Dutch director, Maren Ade, may well have been caught up in the ridiculousness and satire of her whole creation though - which sometimes worked but at other times were left stale.


Some fairly good characters and fairly good dialogue, this tragedy/comedy caught me off guard with its' seemingly-uncharacteristically serious elements - as Ines begins to let down her defences, I felt that so did I.

Though perhaps a controversial opinion, I can't really say I would give Toni Erdmann the time of day again; not a tragic effort but one best left at one time only viewing. Although I appreciate a foreign language film generating a bit of buzz, and liked their attempt at bringing things back to basics, I couldn't vouch for it past 'it's not bad'.


6/10

Monday, 13 March 2017

Movie Marathon Monday: The Fast & the Furious

Fast 8 (The Fate of the Furious) is set to meet our 2017 need for speed; Vin & Dwayne take over our screens once more in the latest instalment out 12th April. As ready as I'll ever be, I decided to take on the task of rewatching the entire franchise of full films before its' impending release.


The Fast & Furious Series
The Fast and the Furious (2001)
2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)
The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006)
Fast & Furious (2009)
Fast Five (2011)
Fast & Furious 6 (2013)
Furious 7 (2015)
Runtime: 13hr 41min


Plot
Although each film has its's own individual plot, the basic premise is fast cars, hot women and some beautiful scenery - coupled with plenty of chases, races and law-breaking.

Why watch it?
Get caught up in the beer-drinking, car-racing, mean streets of Los Angeles and beyond. Despite not being the most well-written or aesthetically-pleasing, most of the films within the marathon are largely entertaining if you like turbo-charged thrill-rides combined with a lavish lifestyle (or if you are a Vin Diesel fan: because, let's face it, he makes the movies).

High Points
The first ever drag race in the original movie. Dom's crash (and preceding drag race) in The Fast & the Furious. Dom v Hobbs (Fast Five), and the vault heist. The highway tank action in Fast & Furious 6

Low Points
2 Fast 2 Furious - I'm surprised they ever got past this to make it to a third. Aspects of Tokyo Drift. Plenty of terrible cameos.

Fun Fact
The whole premise of the franchise was thought up after an article entitled 'Racer X' was published in 1998, focusing on the illegal street-racing scene.